Tag: Reviews (N)

Doctor Who Season One Redux

So, I’ve finally got around to buying the first season of the new Who on DVD. Thoughts will follow sporadically over the enxt wee while.

Rose

Some people have decried ‘Rose’ as being a bit naff. Some have said that the Autons needed a proper story. Every single one of these people doesn’t seem to get it. ‘Rose’ works because we see an adventure of the Doctor through the eyes of a character who isn’t part of his world… yet.

Anyway, the Autons were always a one-trick pony.

The commentary was interesting; very little on the writing of the episode and why certain design choices were made but a lot of discussion about how some of the effects (such as the JFK photo) just didn’t look right.

All in all, a good episode. It was great when I first saw it; less great now but only because it was followed by some even better stories. Still one of the best pilots ever; if I hadn’t been a fan when I watched I would have soon become one.

Hex, Parte Deux

Hex Season Two was disappointingly okay.

I’m still trying to get my head around this. Season One was a train wreck running in slow motion filmed from odd angles; occasionally it was high art but often it was really was the proverbial ‘accident waiting to happen.’ Season Two is far more competent, mostly because it spreads the story over thirteen episodes rather than six and so the characters end up getting from point A to C through B rather than leaving the existence of B up to the viewer’s imagination. (more…)

Filler Post #1

So, a while ago, ‘Cerebus’ came to its end.

I was probably about twenty when Hewligan and Darmeus introduced me to the Aardvark. I had already cultivated an interest in earth pigs but Cerebus was different. ‘High Society’ and ‘Church and State’ weren’t just comic books; they were treatises, dealing with matters political, religious and polemical in a way that I had never seen. This was the point in time that I realised that the things people call ‘pop culture’ could be so much more than ‘idle entertainment.’ (more…)

What I Did On Me Weekend

Every year, about November time, Ant Timpson, with the help of ‘V’ (both literally and metaphorically) hosts a marathon of cinematic challenges found nowhere else in the world. It’s a long, arduous journey and only the most devoted fans of the silver screen attend.

Needless to say, I and my compadres were in attendance.

No one really knows what makes Ant select the films he does. Some people say that he consults the Nine Masters on the Holy Mountain, whilst others claim that he uses an agent provocateur by the name of Solomon King. Whatever the case, Ant’s film line-up is always a surprise and never fails to amuse; even the dreck gets a thunderous applause.

And what dreck there was. ‘The Holy Mountain;’ funny for about twenty minutes, painful for what felt like the next seven years of my life. ‘Black Agent, Lucky Man;’ possibly an average film had it not be spliced out of order and feature incomprehensible dialogue. Some people poo-poo-ed Ken Russell’s ‘Lisztomania,’ but not I. This was the film that finally proved once and for all that it was the dirty Protestants who caused the Holocaust and Hitler was Frankenstein was Wagner. Or something like that. I was tired and needed another ‘V’ to get me through the rest of the night.

Top five (in no order): ‘Lady Terminator,’ if only because it finally confirms every man’s worst fear; something does live up there and it is hungry. I have to ask, though; if she had laser eyes why didn’t she use them earlier?

Thunderbirds Are Go: It doesn’t matter that the entire film seems to be about the Tracey Brothers proving their masculinity and that by the end we seem to have declared war on the Martians; it’s about beautiful industrial designs and things clicking together.

And Cliff Richard.

Invasion of the Body Snatchers: Every year we get a classic film, from ‘The Thing’ to ‘Return of the Living Dead.’ ‘Invasion of the Body Snatchers’ (the 1978 version) is a great example of smart science fiction with an incredibly downbeat ending that suggests that our invaders will end up living a boring version of our own existence. Probably far too deep and meaning for a crowd bloated on the excesses of twenty-three hours of cinema’s more unusual citizens, but damn good to see on the big screen.

Burial Grounds: It isn’t good; as zombie films go it features terrible effects and a plot that isn’t simple but rather dumb. What it does have, though, is either the worst portrayal of an eight year-old by a midget or the creepiest treatment of an adult by his mother ever committed to celluloid. I accidentally bought this film in London and have never looked back. Next year we should get ‘Zombie Nosh.’

Lisztomania: Giant penises, comparing Wagner to Dracula and Roger Daltrey playing Franz Liszt. What more does a boy need. It has musical numbers, a spaceship and the killing of Hitler through music. I suspect I’ll be humming the main tune for a while to come.

Worst film: Not ‘Troll 2.’ It may be consistently bad and wildly illogical, but it was beaten hands down by ‘Streets of Fire: A Rock and Roll Fable’ which scared us with Willem Dafoe’s teeth and didn’t feature anywhere enough Rock and/or Roll. Still, Rick Moranis in a straight role… It didn’t suit him.

All in all, another full day of cinematic joy wrapped in gowns and flavoured with V. The Marathon wouldn’t be the same without that synonymous green can. The Can provides life, the Can provides vitality and Can sponsors the shebang. I can’t hep but associate V with the marathon and when it comes to buying energy drinks (which is far more often than I would like to admit) I tend to go for V, knowing that the Can will reward me come November.

Parts of this ‘review’ were written with the express intention of praising ‘V’ to make sure they continue to support the marathon.

Thoughts on Torchwood

Angels, Demons and the Da Vinci Code

As part of my researches into a course on conspiracy theories I have read all the Robert Langton (all two of them) books that Dan Brown wrote. ‘Angels and Demons,’ the lesser known of the two, details an Illuminati plot to destroy the Vatican and features a quest to locate the Church of Illumination. It also features an initially interesting sub-plot about a Catholic priest-scientist creating matter and anti-matter to prove the creation ex nihilo hypothesis (which, as a plot point, amounts to nothing in the end). ‘The Da Vinci Code’ (film coming soon) is about the Priory of Sion and the Church’s suppression of the Sacred Feminine. Conspiracy-tastic; pity that these two books are badly written, clumsily plotted and barely researched. As my good friend Majikthise pithily put it, seven million people can be wrong.

First, the characterisation. Nothing is left to the reader’s imagination; you always know what your main characters are thinking, which means that the suspense of ‘Will they or won’t they?’ is always ruined within a paragraph. Add to that the obvious candidate for ‘villian of the piece’ and you get paper cutouts maskerading as people. Robert Langton is a stereotype university professor of the school of ‘I obviously have never been taught by a university academic.’ Let’s ignore the flashbacks of classes (that belong, rightfully or wrongly, on TV) or the moments of erudition that seem to come straight from guide books. No, let’s focus on the characterisation. We can tell he is an academic because he wears tweed. Everything after that is just obvious.

The plot of each book is basically this: Langton is brought to the site of a bizaare murder. The murder scene evokes some esoteric fact of which he is the only real expert and is a clue that leads him to the next clue, which is itself a clue that leads to the next, and so forth. Luckily, as Robert isn’t totally polymathic, he gets a nubile assistant, say, a quamtum biologist or a cryptographer, who is able to help out. They solve each clue whilst being pursued by a religious zealot who is also an assasin. The assasin thinks they are working for a particular group (the Illuminati or the Church) but this is all a front. The real villian of the piece turns out to have been working with them the entire time amd they are only stopped in the nick of time. Normality is restored and Langton gets it on with the assistant (who, bizaarely, isn’t one of his graduate students). It’s plot-by-numbers, sometimes literally.

As to the research… I realise that fiction doesn’t have to map history. Surely, though, you can present the history as accurately as possible in the context of the story? You would expect Adam Weisshaupt to be mentioned in any history of the Illuminati. Aargh. The wish to wax lyrical on the non-lyrical nature of ‘The Da Vinci Code’ is doing my head in. I should focus these issues into exciting course content.

Yes.

Yes, I shall.